 |
| Jan Windglows Exposes Mary Prantil |
|
|
Jan Windglows and James Morgan Announces Lawsuits Won Against Cyber Stalker Mary T. Prantil Of Astoria New York. More Information Will Be Coming So Check Back Frequently.
|
Mayor
Says Crime Is Down in 2011,NYC Mayor Bloomberg Says Crime Is Down in
2011,Cyber Crime In New York City,New York State,Queens New York
Cyber Crime Rises, Mayor
Michael Bloomberg, NYC Mayor Bloomberg
Claims Felony Crime
Down
,New
York City averages
2000 serious crimes, New
York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, New York City
criminal
court
in New York, Mayor
Michael, Mayor
Bloomberg, New
York City's historic,
two-decade decline in crime
isn't
over, Mayor
Michael Bloomber,g on crime in NYC, NYC
Mayor Bloomberg Claims Felony Crime Down, Crime in New York City
climbed (slightly in 2011, Michael
Bloomberg, New York City Michael Bloomberg, Bloomberg
Michael,Bloomberg, Michael, NYC, N.Y.C, N.Y.P.D, New York Police, New
York Police Department, New York Crime, Crime In New York 2011,
Election Of Mayor Bloomberg, Mayor Bloomberg Reelection, Re-Election
Of Mayor Bloomberg, Mayor Bloomberg & Mary Prantil, Mary Prantil
And Mayor Bloomberg, Mary Prantil criminal Records, Civil Records Of
Mary Prantil, Mary Prantil Of Astoria Queens New York, Mary Prantil
Corrects The Record Blogspot, Mary Prantil Corrects The Record Rip
Off Report Blogspot, Mary Prantil Google Profile, Google Profile
Linkedin Mary Prantil, Mayor Bloomberg Press Release, Mayor
Bloomberg's Platform Debates, Mayor Bloomberg's New York Crime
Problem, NYC Security Issues, NYC Terrorist Alerts, Mary Prantil &
Mayor Bloomberg, mary prantil, Mary T. Prantil, Cyber Stalker Mary
Theresa Prantil,Prantil, Mary, Mary T., Prantil Mary T., Criminal
Search Mary Prantil, Mayor Michael Bloomberg Twitter, Mayor Michael
Bloomberg Facebook, Mayor Michael Bloomberg News, Google Profile
Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Mayor Michael Bloomberg Reports, Hani Salama
Identity Theft By Cyber Stalker Mary Prantil, Hani Salama Defends Jan
Windglows Against SCAM Mary Prantil
|
Jan
Windglows And Jim Morgan
Launch
& Win Civil Lawsuits Against
Stalker Mary T. Prantil
This
court action has been a long time in coming over the last five years,
and we've tried everything humanly possible in avoiding such an
action against anyone however, some folks just don't know when to
shut their lying mouths and or, shut down their scamming campaigns against others, such
as Mary Theresa Prantil of Astoria New York.
Prantil
has been warned and warned over the last five years to stop the
on-line slandering of our good names, but our warnings have fallen on
deaf ears and thus, now she will be brought to justice through the
courts.
Miss
Prantil was served the legal suit and was given ample time to respond
to our legal team and the courts, but chose to respond in the way she
always responds, In not legally responding or showing up for
court.
Instead,
Prantil continues her badgering of innocent persons, posting libelous
information over the Internet and attacking anyone that has served
her with legal actions coming from the courts and so fourth. Her main defense to
the charges that we've brought against her, is no defense, as I've
always stated.
We've
won the default against Prantil and thus, we plan to have her
prosecuted to the fullest extent that the law will allow. Basically,
all her talk through the years about suing others for allegedly
scamming her, is now coming back to her for scamming and slandering
others.
When
this is all over concerning the Civil Courts, and we have a huge
financial judgment against this antagonist, we plan to bring multiple
federal charges against her in the criminal courts simply to
make her accountable for all her criminal activities against us
personally.
As
we've said over and over again throughout the years, we will stand in
court against Prantil any day of the week however, I don't believe
she holds the same sentiment about facing us in a court of law for the reasons below.
She doesn't hold the same sentiments simply because she was again, given 20 and then 35 days to respond to our
law suit against her and never showed, nor did she produce council
for her defense.
Nope,
didn't respond, didn't show up, didn't produce any evidence to any of her claims,
Couldn't produce any evidence that our claims against her were
allegedly false, nothing.
Nothing, but her lose and un-provable
accusations to the wrong people who will end up helping us put
her away into a nice tight little jail cell for the criminally insane on Rikers Island N.Y.C.
Unlike
to most cases of this nature involving innocent persons and their Internet stalkers, scammers
and people that run around and liable others, we won't settle out of
court and further, we will seek the utmost justice in this matter against prantil
for smearing our names over the Internet for the last five years.
We will pursue her in a federal court criminally for the four or five federal charges
we've named in the suit against her, that will be relayed on to the
F.B.I and Department Of Justice for prosecution.
The suit in question along with the
additional criminal charges were seeking against her isn't a
matter of alleged personal vendetta more so, then the pursuit of
justice and simply doing the right thing in having our laws enforced against what we feel to be a criminal, just fore the record.
In
other words, we don't have any problems in what a person has to say
about us if it's vented in the way of an opinion, or in a factual
format.
Again, we don't have the slightest issue with free speech or
the freedom of expression however, we do have a problem with
slanderous and liable content being posted about our persons and
company name by some Idiot looking to make a name for themselves.
Especially,
when a person like Prantil is attempting to advertise her own
endeavors through bashing other high profile names, or company names
such as she done to many others
besides ourselves in the past.
We
will NOT negotiate, settle or otherwise with someone in whom we
consider to be a on-line criminal or worse, Internet Terrorist and
again, we are seeking the harshest legal outcome against Mary Prantil
to not only impede, but in stopping her from ever doing this to another person or
company again.
We simply believe that the Internet should be a clean and safe
place for people to interact, learn and conduct business without harassment of
any kind coming from persons such as prantil.
In
the end, Prantil will be held accountable for all her criminal deeds
by the State of New York, Nevada courts, and legal teams on all sides
of this conflict, or in any conflict that she has directly caused through her illegal activities against
innocent others.
She
will eventually be made to face the Ones she's harassed and stalked
over the years and further, to prove her false allegations against
many persons in whom she's targeted from behind her cell phone, home
phone and computers.
The
Prantil case will hopefully set a legal president in the courts that
will ultimately put an end to this sort of harassment and or, liable
over the Internet coming from people with nothing better to do.
Nothing better to do then
in attempting to destroy other persons lives, reputations and businesses over
the open air ways, simply because they have nothing better to do with
their own lives but in trying to reach a celebrity status through
the repeated bashing of others.
We
know who Mary Prantil is, and where she lives and thus, there is no
more running or hiding for her behind anonymous names on the scam
sites and so, her element of surprise is gone along with her
credibility.
If
anyone out reading this has a stalker likened to Mary
Prantil, we would encourage you to seek legal relief against your
protagonist, don't let them get away with taking your quality of life away from
you any longer.
In short, stand up to them and take them down through
the court system, and let these folks know that they are no longer safe
behind their computers or telephones.
Again,
for all the good people out there that are being attacked by idiots
like Prantil for no apparent reason, I would strongly recommend using
the legal firm that we're currently using to apply REAL legal
pressure against Prantil in this instance. Who we plan in using way into the future for all our legal needs.
Through
Scott Chapman's services you can not only trace your Antagonist down
through technical means, but identify and drag them into court to be
held accountable for their on-going harassment of you personally, or
your Company.
Mr.
Chapman will put you in touch with other highly credible, sincere,
ethical and professional people that specialize in the many areas of
investigation, electronic evidence gathering, legal filings and Law
Enforcement, that will effectively stop what your going through with
any person that might be harassing you, or attempting to destroy your
business be it on-line or land based.
These
services offered by the various professionals that Scott Chapman can
put you in touch with are personable people that understand your
plight and further, that will give you the real help that you need at
an affordable fee. They work with you on every level.
A
good many of you know Enchantress Jan and myself out there, and you
know that we won't endorse anyone that we haven't personally worked
with or liked. On this last note, Jan and I fully endorse Scott
Chapman and his legal team of professionals, just so you know.
We
would further strongly encourage you to contact him immediately to
resolve any issues you might be having on the Internet with un-ture
statements being launched against your business or personal name.
Reputation
management is vital in protecting your name online however, this in
itself isn't enough as the nasty poster will just keep posting on you
no matter how good your reputation management currently would be.
Not
only will you have to push the negative content down off the search
engines but you will also seek out the source of the negative
content, or the person generating their nasty content and legally
stopping them from continuing this negative smearing campaign against
you.
Mr.
Chapman is a resourceful man who knows his business well, he has the
right contacts, knows all legal in and outs, he's dedicated to the
case and moreover, is interested in doing the right thing by others, He is a spiritual man that loves truth justice.
Don't
take my word for it, call him up and see for yourself, or check out
his credentials posted on the web site and you'll be amazed. I can't
say enough about Scott and his legal Team, Really.
So I will let him speak
for himself through posting his contact information below. Good luck
to you and we will be posting updates to the Prantil case as we go, so
be sure to check back frequently.
Sincerely,
Jim
Morgan and Jan Windglows
Scott
E. Chapman, Esq., MBA, CIPP
http://www.mccormickbarstow.com/showbio.aspx?show=182
McCormick
Barstow, LLP
8337
W. Sunset Road, Suite 350
Las
Vegas, Nevada 89113
(702)
949-1100 (702)
949-1106 (direct) (702)
949-1101 (fax) Email: scott.chapman@mccormickbarstow.com
Website: http://www.McCormickBarstow.com
|
HANI SALAMA DOESN'T DEFEND SCAM MARY PRANTIL AGAINST SCAM BUSTER JAN WINDGLOWS.
YET, ANOTHER INNOCENT PERSON THAT THIS STALKER PRANTIL DRAGS INTO HER SHIT ON-LINE
Current 2011 CIVIL RECORDS OF Mary Prantil
|
|
Press This Link of: http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASMain
Then Punch In The Code – Then Party Search – Click the “Either” Burton for criminal
or civil records.
Then punch the “Find Case” button at the bottom of the page– You'll see some blue links pop up on the top of the next page.
Pull up one of the four reports by pressing any one of these blue links.
Look At The Bottom Of each Report And Click either: “Show All Appearances” -- “Show Motions” - “Show All Decisions”
|
|
Mary Prantil has stated over the last four years that she absolutely “loves the state of New York and Mayor Michael Bloomberg”and or, “NYC is the greatest city on earth” yet, why do we show records of Ms. Prantil suing the city of New York for alleged offenses against her, as the records below show below?
Mary Prantil has also refereed, and repeatedly urged the readers on the site of Rip Off Report and other similar whistle blower sites in contacting two specific police officers of NYC police department known as Eric Rodriguez and Jose Rodriguez in such ludicrous things as "getting their money back" from us or to "file a police report with these officers" against us for whatever reason and further, to call them directly. More nonsense and blatent outright FRAUD on Mary Prantil's part.
This is obviously more of Mary Prantil's lunatic crap against innocent others on the Internet and even more so toward the New York Police department. WHY? Because she's asking the public to file reports against Jan and myself with what appears to be defendants against more of her ungrounded charges of negligence against the New York City police department there in Queens and Manhattan New York according to the court records.
You see, these were the same New York police officers that were dispatched by the New York court system to arrest Mary Prantil on a bench warrant for breaking a previous restraining order filed on her for stalking by none other than Hani Salama, who is Mary Prantil's ex boyfriend.
In retaliation with malice, ill will and intent against the New York Police Department, Mary Prantil filed this frivolous lawsuit against her favorite city of New York "The Big Apple" lol. It's interesting as the New York Manhattan court had asked Mary Prantil to come in and address the charges against her concerning the Hani Salama restraining order to which she not only didn't show up in court for, but eluded the police for a couple of weeks by hiding out in her filthy New York apartment.
The police went to her apartment and waited for her to take out the trash and thus, when she showed up at the curb, the police took her out as part of the garbage lol. Mary Prantil fell to the ground kicking and screaming, while shouting out that the police were attempting to rape and beat her up however this dull witted criminal forgot that the apartment complex in which she was living had active cameras that recorded the whole event, as well as the entire neighborhood watching the NYC haul crazy Mary Prantil away to jail.
Let's not forget the fifty or sixty witnesses that observed the incident as it unfolded while in the end, watched in horror and humor as they hauled this freako Mary Prantil off to jail. The case was thrown out against the Officers, as Mary Prantil's clams were slanderous at best, against the state of New York and these fine upstanding NYC Officers who were only there to do their job, which was to arrest criminal Mary Prantil on an active bench warrant, in which they did. Even though Mary Prantil fell to the ground like a spoiled screaming child while screaming the officers were "raping" her, yeah right, lol. In her sicko dreams perhaps.
Of course, we also see Mary Prantil attempting to sue folks but losing in these reports below and moreover, other Companies suing her for non-payment of her debts to them, along with one of her Attorneys dropping her case for the reason that she is a ranting crazy idiot who refuses to listen to any reasoning, and more then likely, fought against his advice repeatedly, or was perpetually combative in his defense of her. We can find five other instances of Mary Prantil losing her Counsel as a result of her bad personal conduct as her criminal records reflect.
We also see that Mary Prantil utilizes the New York Public Defender's office provided by the court in taking on her charges against other private people and the state. Wow, does this mean that Mary Prantil is using tax payers dollars to play the legal system? I think it does, as the records reflect below.
Why does Mary Prantil still have several criminal and civil cases going currently that should have been resolved well over four years ago through the New York legal process that usually handles these types of cases in a couple of months at the longest? Especially when the evidence is so overwhelming against a person such as Mary Prantil in these instances being that she has several criminal charges on her record that have been ongoing for not weeks, or months, but now years. If New York truly intends to serve the justice on Mary Prantil that she so well deserves, why then, doesn't New York act on and enforce their laws concerning the criminal charges against Mary Prantil?
Hani Salama, Prantil's EX- Boyfriend, is one such person that has criminal charges filed against Mary Prantil along with four other New Yorkers. Yet, Prantil stalked and showed up at Hani Salama's door one night, barged her way into his home past his room mate, then attacked her ex and in his own self defense, he shoved her to get her away from himself, then she had him arrested for simple battery, simply because the state couldn't enforce the restraining order he had against her for stalking him. Mary Prantil relentlessly stalked her ex boyfriend very drastically, and borrowed the cell phones of people on the street in her measures to locate the home of her ex boyfriend, then without reservation, proceeded to knock on his door once she found out where his residence was.
Mary Prantil went on to post his picture on one of her lie filled blog sites geared to harm our reputations, and titled it “Hani Salama Defends Mary Prantil Against Scam Jan Windglows”, while attempting to deceive the public in believing that Hani Salama was actually writing all these negative statements against us when in all actuality, it is Mary Prantil writing and posting this trash against us all along under his name, while using his picture without his permission.
Is that Identity Theft? I think so, the very charge Prantil charges others with on a continual basis over the Internet, the same crime Dana Thornton has bee charged with currently being impersonation and identity theft.
Mary Prantil went on to create and post five gay websites on another man there in New York City, who had filed criminal charges against her out of retaliation. Of course she also proceeded in passing out his private information on the porn sites along with a request for people to call him for free gay sex, even though the man isn't gay; he was only an honest hard working business owner that had the great misfortune of Mary Prantil crossing his path when she was not in a good mood.
Mary Prantil also called this man's land lord in the apartment building where he lived, and threatened to slam and blackmail him on the Internet should he not kick out the man that had charges against her, Mary Prantil also went as far as calling the D.E.A and A.T.F on the man that had charges against her, in a effort to harass and have him unfairly arrested or incarcerated. Of course these law enforcement agencies found no wrong doing in the man's activities.
This wasn't enough for Prantil, as she went on to post numerous false reports and criminal charges on the innocent person, however there are many criminal charges currently on Mary Prantil in the New York Courts, to which are still pending. The evidence is there, the witnesses are there, the proof is there, yet her charges continue to be pending for over four years now, to date. Why ? Normally when a criminal is brought to justice and the evidence and witnesses are there, the criminal gets PROSECUTED. So, why not Mary Prantil?
Mary Prantil has had a lawsuit filed and won against her by Jan Windglows and myself James Morgan, to which she didn't show up to in her own defense yet, she's went on to harass and stalk others like Ray Meseroll of Bmore Radio. Why? Because he aired a radio show or two exposing her as a scam, to which she was given the opportunity to show up to to state her side of the story, but didn't at anytime despite several open public invitations to her to do so.
Mary Prantil posted trash with numerous fabricated reports against Mike Cahill who performed spell services for her, to which she charged back on six times and further, trash with numerous lies against Michael Jenkins whom just spoke to her over the phone a few times and refused to do any spell work for her. We have hard copy records of these conversations and other records to prove these statements in which Mary Prantil incriminates herself every other sentence.
This scam artist Mary Prantil, has numerous false identities on the Internet in which she launches her slamming and scamming trash from against others to which we can prove yet, she accuses other of this on a daily bases. She commits the crimes, then blames her crimes on other innocent people in her efforts to direct negative attentions away from herself. It is quite sick really. Mary Prantil seems to have a habit of accusing others of the same offenses she's guilty in carrying out, which is one of the many flaws her psychotic personality demonstrates the mile markers of a psychotic sociopath with no remorse for the criminal acts she commits against innocent other people, many of who have never done anything to her or have merely tried to help her in some way.
Without re- hashing the information that has since been made public knowledge in the past along with the new information posted on this criminal, let me move on as follows below. So, what we have here is a two bit scammer that was ran out of the state of California whom has been in trouble with the courts for at least twenty years of her miserable life, in short.
Whom further comes from a corrupt family of attorneys whom has went on in making her living in scamming on-line businesses by charging back on them, liable them on the web for not giving into her demands, or launching frivolous lawsuits to obtain settlements etc.
We can show that her father Frank G. Prantil was sent to a California prison for a couple of years for stealing a great deal of money from a client awaiting trial for murder whom he was representing, and then lying about it to a grand jury that also resulted in his disbarment.
We can show that her uncle Richard G. Prantil filed false court documents in scamming the courts and a once client out of ten thousand dollars four years lat er and after the fact of him handling their case, in which he was legally forced to pay back. Both Mary Prantil's father and her uncle were disbarred for a certain amount of time, Richard acquired his license back for some reason and Frank was just ran out of town there in San Diego California, as he states in one of the court records, "they ran me out on a rail."
Now, we see Mary Prantil using public defenders and or the Court Appointed Attorney's office concerning her nine criminal charges in New York for such things as aggravated harassment, criminal contempt, felony E stalking, resisting arrest, communicating alarm, disobey the court, jumping parole from Rikers Island women's Prison, just to mention a few, while playing the state of New York for over four years and wasting a lot of tax payer dollars, where does it all STOP, and where is the justice in all of this mess?
Ok, this really gripes my ass in that this Mary Prantil, who is obviously a real menace to society, is actually using the state New York to defend herself from the states own charges against her. Please see all the continuances and other legal motions filed by Prantil's public defender in the records below, it will make you sick and possibly, a little embarrassed if your the state prosecuting her. It will make you very angry or even outraged you if your a New York Tax Payer.
This ought to give you a pretty good idea of all the wasted New York tax dollars that have been and are still incurring against Mary Prantil's frivolous legal play in the New York courts. Basically, this criminal is running up the bill for the New York Tax Payers as the state charges and or, raises taxes as a resort of idiots like Prantil making a mockery out of the legal system. This is a huge deficit for a state whom has been on the verge of bankruptcy over the last four years.
Why does the New York legal system continue to allow the New York tax payers to foot the bill for an obviously guilty criminal ? This is one reason why taxes are raised and continue to climb yet higher every year. If the hard working honest people of New York who are trying to raise their families have to be made to continue to foot the bill to pay for Mary Prantil's ongoing criminal activities, the day may soon come that these hard working honest New Yorkers may have a difficult time paying their own bills or even keeping food on their tables to feed their children, pay for their child's education, and more. Any honest hard working New York tax payer hearing about this would of course be furious.
The insane thing is that New York allows this creepy criminal to spend most of her time harassing and posting trash on numerous innocent businesses on Internet while she hides behind 60 or so anonymous names. That is, when she's between her court hearings for committing some of the same crimes there in NYC, how PATHETIC is that?
Even more pathetic, Mary Prantil posts under such names as "American Thinkers" and "Americas Dreamer" thinking that she is hiding behind her garbage of things she says such as that she is "living the American Dream" while writing about how much she loves New York, which are only lies from a criminal and a hypocrite that does not even deserve to have the many priviledges that honest and forthright Americans deserve, yet the New York court and legal systems have taken it as far as allowing Mary Prantil to slap them blatently in the face with her actually suing New York all the while talking about "what a great city New York is."
Is this why the New York tax payers put young policemen through training and place these officers in life threatening situations on a daily basis? So a dirty scammer like Mary Prantil can slap New York in the face while riding the court systems at the hard working honest New York tax payer's expense?
What I'd like to know Mayor Bloomberg and Governor Cuomo, is why do you permit this piece of New York Trash to harass innocent people not only in New York but across state lines for over four years plus, when it's evident that this criminal Mary Prantil of Astoria Queens New York should have been put under a jail some place so she can be prevented from causing harm to innocent people?
Did you know that we've had people call into us stating that Prantil was doing this sort of thing when she was only twenty eight years old and now she is fifty? Yes, doing these same things to other on-line and land based business owners. You know, we the people of the United States that rely on our court and legal systems to prosecute criminals instead of continuing to allow them to continue their crime spree for years at a time, that are tired of scum balls like Mary Prantil using the legal system while harassing others through this same system in and out of the courts, and actually allowing her to go free, time and time again.
Yep, we're tired of a entire such as New York in allowing criminals like Prantil to file one frivolous lawsuit after another, and others having to file legitimate lawsuits against her simply because, the state of New York can't seem to get this idiot out of society. Why is this?
A State whom further seems to be more interested in the rights of a criminal personality such as Mary Prantil, over the rights of those that follow the laws of the State and federal government. A State that allows a person like this to attack the very D.A. that is prosecuting her case, and does nothing.
When this same criminal has managed to remove the primary D.A. that was prosecuting her case, just because she called him and incriminated herself in one of numerous harassing calls to him. I want to know why New York can't clean up its own trash pertaining to Mary Prantil, and why must the rest of Society and or, the Tax Payers endure this kind of crap coming from a low life criminal especially, when your paid to keep this element of society under control?
In closing, Mary Prantil has total and flagrant disregard for the law, and the rules of society on the whole. She's a slap in the face to justice, and a parasite that feeds off of the hard work and peace of all honest and peace loving people everywhere just trying to make a living in this sick and struggling U.S. economy.
Mary Prantil is the very thing that erodes society at its very foundation and can be considered, the very sickness that society allows to continue simply because, it doesn't want to violate her civil rights even though, criminals like Mary Prantil do not deserve any civil rights. What about the civil rights of the people Mary Prantil has and continues to injure? Why should criminals like Mary Prantil have any kind of rights when she doesn't observe the rights of others over a prolong period of years? She's a repeat offender and a CRIMINAL guys and you are elected officials, so please play by the legal rules and laws and put her in jail, and keep her there.
|
|
|
WebCivil Supre - Case
DetaiL
|
Court:
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
031093/2002
|
|
Case Name:
|
PRANTIL, MARY vs. LAMPROPOULOS, CHRISTOPHER ANO
|
|
Case Type:
|
Motor Vehicle
|
|
Track:
|
Complex
|
|
RJI Filed:
|
11/28/2003
|
|
Date NOI Due:
|
|
|
Jury Status:
|
|
|
Justice Name:
|
COMPLIANCE CONF JUDGE
|
|
Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
|
|
GEOGHAN & COHEN
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
7 PENN PLAZA SUITE 505 NEW YORK NY 10001
|
|
212-465-0600
|
|
|
Attorney/Firm For Defendant:
|
|
JERROLD N. COHEN
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
163 MINEOLA BLVD - POB #229 MINEOLA, NY 11501
|
|
1 - 718 - 895 - 3215
|
|
|
|
ISSERLIS AND SULLIVAN, ESQ.,
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
999 STEWART AVENUE BETHPAGE, NEW YORK 11714
|
|
516-349 0111
|
WebCivil Supreme - Appearance Detail
|
Court:
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
031093/2002
|
|
Case Name:
|
PRANTIL, MARY vs. LAMPROPOULOS, CHRISTOPHER ANO
|
|
Case Type:
|
Motor Vehicle
|
|
Track:
|
Complex
|
Appearance Information:
|
Appearance Date
|
Time
|
On For
|
Appearance Outcome
|
Justice / Part
|
Comments
|
Motion Seq
|
|
10/26/2004
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Stayed-Bankruptcy
|
ALLAN B. WEISS PRENOTE COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE
|
INTERBORO
|
|
|
01/05/2004
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Preliminary Conference Held
|
ALLAN B. WEISS PT 2 PRELIM CONF
|
|
|
|
12/22/2003
|
|
Supreme Initial (first time on)
|
Adjourned
|
ALLAN B. WEISS PT 2 PRELIM CONF
|
|
|
|
WebCivil Supreme - Case Detail
|
|
|
|
Court:
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
022186/2009
|
|
Case Name:
|
3285 REALTY COMPANY LLC vs. PRANTIL, MARY ETAL
|
|
Case Type:
|
Other Real Property
|
|
Track:
|
Complex
|
|
RJI Filed:
|
01/26/2010
|
|
Date NOI Due:
|
|
|
NOI Filed:
|
04/21/2011
|
|
Disposition Date:
|
|
|
Calendar Number:
|
|
|
Jury Status:
|
Non-Jury
|
|
Justice Name:
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
|
Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
|
|
|
MARK S. FRIELANDER
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
|
150 BROADWAY
|
|
|
ATTORNEY RELIEVED
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOLDBERG/SCUDIERI & BLOCK, P.C
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
|
45 WEST 45TH STREET STE 1401 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036
|
|
WebCivil Supreme - Appearance Detail
|
Court:
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
022186/2009
|
|
Case Name:
|
3285 REALTY COMPANY LLC vs. PRANTIL, MARY ETAL
|
|
Case Type:
|
Other Real Property
|
|
Track:
|
Complex
|
Appearance Information:
|
Appearance Date
|
Time
|
On For
|
Appearance Outcome
|
Justice / Part
|
Comments
|
Motion Seq
|
|
01/26/2012
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 HEARINGS
|
|
|
|
12/15/2011
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Adjourned
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 HEARINGS
|
|
|
|
10/27/2011
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Adjourned
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 HEARINGS
|
|
|
|
10/27/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Fully Submitted
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
092911
|
009
|
|
09/29/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Adjourned
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
092911
|
009
|
|
09/22/2011
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Adjourned
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 HEARINGS
|
PER SFO 8/11/11 10 A.M.
|
|
|
08/11/2011
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Adjourned
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 HEARINGS
|
PER SFO 8/11/11 2:15 P.M.
|
|
|
08/11/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Fully Submitted
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
OSC=LIC PPS/CHS
|
008
|
|
07/18/2011
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Remove Stay
|
COMPLIANCE CONF JUDGE PT 36 GEN CAL
|
PER SOS
|
|
|
07/14/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Adjourned
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
OSC=LIC TO CC 6/29/11
|
008
|
|
05/19/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Motion Decided-Open Appearance
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN OSC TO CHAMBERS
|
|
007
|
|
04/22/2011
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Note Filed
|
COMPLIANCE CONF JUDGE NOTE OF ISSUE DUE
|
|
|
|
03/31/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Motion Withdrawn
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
031011
|
004
|
|
03/31/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Motion Withdrawn
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
|
006
|
|
03/31/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Fully Submitted
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
OSC=LIC TO MSO 3/15*
|
005
|
|
03/10/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Adjourned
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
031011
|
004
|
|
10/19/2010
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Compliance Conference Held
|
COMPLIANCE CONF JUDGE PRENOTE COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE
|
|
|
|
10/19/2010
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Remove Stay
|
COMPLIANCE CONF JUDGE COMPLIANCE CONF PART
|
|
|
|
09/14/2010
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Action Stayed
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PRENOTE COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE
|
30 DAYS RETAIN ATTY.
|
|
|
08/12/2010
|
|
Motion
|
Fully Submitted
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
RCVD: 12/09/10 OTC: 1/10/11
|
003
|
|
07/15/2010
|
|
Motion
|
Adjourned
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
071510 TO MSO 6/25*
|
003
|
|
05/25/2010
|
|
Motion
|
Motion Decided-Open Appearance
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN OSC TO CHAMBERS
|
|
002
|
|
05/24/2010
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Preliminary Conference Held
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 PRELIM CONF
|
|
|
|
05/19/2010
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Remove Stay
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 GEN CAL
|
|
|
|
03/04/2010
|
|
Motion
|
Fully Submitted
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 MOTIONS
|
OSC=LIC
|
001
|
|
02/22/2010
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Stayed-Attorney Relieved
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 PRELIM CONF
|
45 DAYS PER SFO 3/4/10
|
|
|
02/08/2010
|
|
Supreme Initial (first time on)
|
Adjourned
|
DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN PT 36 PRELIM CONF
|
|
|
|
Motion Number
|
Date Filed
|
Filed By
|
Relief Sought
|
Submit Date
|
Answer Demanded
|
Status
|
Decision
|
Order Signed Date
|
|
009
|
09/09/2011
|
PLAINT
|
Partial Summary Judgement
|
10/27/2011
|
Yes
|
Open:
Before Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
|
|
|
008
|
06/29/2011
|
PLAINT
|
Contempt
|
08/11/2011
|
No
|
Decided: 11-AUG-11 HEARING/TRAVERSE
ORDERED Before Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
Short Form Order
|
08/11/2011
|
|
007
|
05/19/2011
|
PLAINT
|
Contempt
|
|
No
|
Decided: 25-MAY-11 OSC-DECLINED Before
Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
Oral
|
|
|
006
|
03/23/2011
|
PLAINT
|
Modify Order/Judgment
|
|
No
|
Decided: 31-MAR-11 MOTION WITHDRAWN Before
Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
Oral
|
|
|
005
|
03/10/2011
|
DEF
|
Change Or Remove Attorney
|
03/31/2011
|
No
|
Decided: 26-APR-11 MOTION GRANTED Before
Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
Short Form Order
|
04/26/2011
|
|
004
|
03/02/2011
|
PLAINT
|
Modify Order/Judgment
|
|
No
|
Decided: 31-MAR-11 MOTION WITHDRAWN Before
Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
Oral
|
|
|
003
|
06/22/2010
|
PLAINT
|
Restraining Order/Enjoin
|
08/12/2010
|
No
|
Decided: 20-SEP-10 ORDER SIGNED Before
Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
Pltf Long Form Order
|
01/11/2011
|
|
002
|
05/25/2010
|
PLAINT
|
Injunction
|
|
No
|
Decided: 27-MAY-10 OSC-DECLINED Before
Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
Oral
|
|
|
001
|
02/04/2010
|
PLAINT
|
Change Or Remove Attorney
|
03/04/2010
|
No
|
Decided: 04-MAR-10 MOTION GRANTED Before
Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN
|
Short Form Order
|
03/04/2010
|
|
WebCivil Supreme - Case Detail
|
|
|
|
Court:
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
008220/2010
|
|
Case Name:
|
PRANTIL, MARY vs. CITY OF NEW YORK ETAL
|
|
Case Type:
|
Nyc Negligence
|
|
Track:
|
Expedited
|
|
RJI Filed:
|
08/06/2010
|
|
Date NOI Due:
|
|
|
NOI Filed:
|
04/01/2011
|
|
Disposition Date:
|
|
|
Calendar Number:
|
EE01959
|
|
Jury Status:
|
Jury At Plaintiff's Request
|
|
Justice Name:
|
KEVIN KERRIGAN
|
|
Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
|
|
|
ATTORNEY RELIEVED
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attorney/Firm For Defendant:
|
|
|
CORPORATION COUNSEL
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
|
100 CHURCH STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007
|
|
|
212-788-0800
|
|
|
WebCivil Supreme -
Appearance Detail
|
Court:
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
008220/2010
|
|
Case Name:
|
PRANTIL, MARY vs. CITY OF NEW YORK ETAL
|
|
Case Type:
|
Nyc Negligence
|
|
Track:
|
Expedited
|
Appearance Information:
|
Appearance Date
|
Time
|
On For
|
Appearance Outcome
|
Justice /
|
|
oti
on Seq
|
|
06/17/2011
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Stayed-Attorney Relieved
|
KEVIN KERRIGAN PT 10 GEN CAL
|
45 DAYS PER SFO 6/17/11
|
|
|
06/14/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Fully Submitted - No Opp
|
KEVIN KERRIGAN PT 10 MOTIONS
|
051011
|
002
|
|
05/10/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Adjourned
|
KEVIN KERRIGAN PT 10 MOTIONS
|
051011
|
002
|
|
04/12/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Adjourned
|
KEVIN KERRIGAN PT 10 MOTIONS
|
041211 *MSO 3/29/11
|
002
|
|
04/01/2011
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Note Filed
|
KEVIN KERRIGAN NOTE FILED
|
|
|
|
03/04/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Motion Decided-Open Appearance
|
KEVIN KERRIGAN OSC TO CHAMBERS
|
|
001
|
|
11/01/2010
|
|
Supreme Trial
|
Compliance Conference Held
|
KEVIN KERRIGAN PRENOTE COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE
|
|
|
|
08/24/2010
|
|
Supreme Initial (first time on)
|
Preliminary Conference Held
|
KEVIN KERRIGAN PT 10 PRELIM CONF
|
|
|
|
WebCivil Supreme - Motion Detail
|
Court:
|
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
|
008220/2010
|
|
Case Name:
|
|
PRANTIL, MARY vs. CITY OF NEW YORK ETAL
|
|
Case Type:
|
|
Nyc Negligence
|
|
Track:
|
|
Expedited
|
Motion Information:
|
Motion Number
|
Date Filed
|
Filed By
|
Relief Sought
|
Submit Date
|
Answer Demanded
|
Status
|
Decision
|
Order Signed Date
|
|
002
|
03/29/2011
|
PLAINT
|
Change Or Remove Attorney
|
06/14/2011
|
No
|
Decided: 17-JUN-11 MOTION GRANTED Before
Justice: KERRIGAN
|
Short Form Order
|
06/17/2011
|
|
001
|
03/04/2011
|
PLAINT
|
Change Or Remove Attorney
|
|
No
|
Decided: 07-MAR-11 OSC-DECLINED Before
Justice: KERRIGAN
|
Oral
|
|
Short
Form Order
NEW
YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY
Present:
HONORABLE KEVIN
J. KERRIGAN Part 10
Justice
----------------------------------------X
Mary
Prantil, Index
Number:
8220/10
Plaintiff,
-
against - Motion
Date:
6/14/11
Motion
City
of New York, New York City Police Cal. Number: 23
Department,
Police Officer Erik
Rodriguez
and Police Officer Jose Rodriguez,
Motion
Seq. No.: 2
Defendants.
----------------------------------------X
The
following papers numbered 1 to 4 read on this application
by
Nussin S. Fogel, Esq. To withdraw as plaintiff’s attorney of
record.
Papers
Numbered
Order
to Show Cause-Affirmation-Exhibits............ 1-4
Upon
the foregoing papers it is ordered that the motion is
decided
as follows:
Motion
by Nussin S. Fogel, Esq., to withdraw as counsel for
plaintiff
is granted, there appearing no opposition. Counsel has
sufficiently
explained to the Court’s satisfaction on May 27, 2011,
the
return date of this motion, that the attorney-client
relationship
has so eroded as to render counsel’s continued
representation
of plaintiff impossible. Nussin S. Fogel, Esq. is
directed
to serve plaintiff and counsel for the City with a copy of
this
order with notice of entry without undue delay. All
proceedings
in this action are stayed for a period of 45 days from
the
date of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry so
as
to afford plaintiff the opportunity to retain new counsel.
Dated:
June 17, 2011
KEVIN
J. KERRIGAN, J.S.C.
|
WebCivil Supreme - Case Detail
|
|
|
|
Court:
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
022361/2010
|
|
Case Name:
|
3285 REALTY COMPANY, LLC. vs. PRANTIL, MARY ANO
|
|
Case Type:
|
Other Real Property
|
|
Track:
|
Standard
|
|
RJI Filed:
|
10/27/2010
|
|
Date NOI Due:
|
|
|
NOI Filed:
|
|
|
Disposition Date:
|
04/01/2011
|
|
Calendar Number:
|
|
|
Jury Status:
|
|
|
Justice Name:
|
ROGER N. ROSENGARTEN
|
|
Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
|
|
|
MARK S. FRIELANDER
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
|
150 BROADWAY NEW YROK, N.Y. 10038
|
|
|
212 962-2877
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attorney/Firm For Defendant:
|
|
|
LEGAL AID SOCIETY
|
Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record
|
Atty. Status: Active
|
|
|
120-46 QUEENS BLVD., FL 3 KEW GARDENS, NY 11415
|
|
|
718-286-2461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebCivil
Supreme - Appearance Detail
|
Court:
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
022361/2010
|
|
Case Name:
|
3285 REALTY COMPANY, LLC. vs. PRANTIL, MARY ANO
|
|
Case Type:
|
Other Real Property
|
|
Track:
|
Standard
|
Appearance Information:
|
Appearance Date
|
Time
|
On For
|
Appearance Outcome
|
Justice / Part
|
Comments
|
Motion Seq
|
|
03/09/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Fully Submitted
|
ROGER N. ROSENGARTEN PT 23 MOTIONS
|
012611 DISMISS
|
001
|
|
01/26/2011
|
|
Motion
|
Adjourned
|
ROGER N. ROSENGARTEN PT 23 MOTIONS
|
012611
|
001
|
|
11/24/2010
|
|
Motion
|
Adjourned
|
ROGER N. ROSENGARTEN PT 23 MOTIONS
|
112410
|
001
|
|
11/17/2010
|
|
Motion
|
Motion Withdrawn
|
ROGER N. ROSENGARTEN PT 23 MOTIONS
|
|
002
|
|
11/17/2010
|
|
Motion
|
Administratively Rescheduled
|
ROGER N. ROSENGARTEN PT 23 MOTIONS
|
|
001
|
|
WebCivil Supreme - Motion
Detail
|
Court:
|
|
Queens Civil Supreme
|
|
Index Number:
|
|
022361/2010
|
|
Case Name:
|
|
3285 REALTY COMPANY, LLC. vs. PRANTIL, MARY ANO
|
|
Case Type:
|
|
Other Real Property
|
|
Track:
|
|
Standard
|
Motion Information:
|
Motion Number
|
Date Filed
|
Filed By
|
Relief Sought
|
Submit Date
|
Answer Demanded
|
Status
|
Decision
|
Order Signed Date
|
|
002
|
11/05/2010
|
DEF
|
Dismiss Complaint/Petition
|
|
Yes
|
Decided: 17-NOV-10 MOTION WITHDRAWN Before
Justice: ROSENGARTEN
|
Oral
|
|
|
001
|
10/28/2010
|
DEF
|
Dismiss Complaint/Petition
|
03/09/2011
|
No
|
Decided: 01-APR-11 CASE DISPOSED Before
Justice: ROSENGARTEN
|
Short Form Order
|
04/01/2011
|
|
|
|
|
CASE
INFORMATIONCourtNew
York Criminal Court Case
#2009NY002655 DefendantPrantil,
Mary TAdd
Case to eTrack
Index
-
Defendant
-
Incident
and Arrest
-
Attorney
Information
-
Docket
Sentence
-
Next
Appearance
Defendant
-
Name:Prantil,
Mary T
-
Birth
Year:1964
-
NYSID:3088617J
Incident
and Arrest
Incident
-
Date:June
22, 2008
-
Summons/Ticket
#:
-
CJTN:63355383N
Arrest
Officer
Attorney
Information
Defense
Attorney
-
Name:Unk,
-
Type:Private
(Retained)
-
Court
Date:June 30, 2010
-
Court
Part:B
-
Phone:000
- 000 - 0000
Assistant
District Attorney
Next
Appearance
Docket
Sentence
No
Sentence Information on File
Incident
and Arrest
Incident
-
Date:June
22, 2008
-
Summons/Ticket
#:
-
CJTN:63355383N
Arrest
Officer
Attorney
Information
Defense
Attorney
-
Name:Unk,
-
Type:Private
(Retained)
-
Court
Date:June 30, 2010
-
Court
Part:B
-
Phone:000
- 000 - 0000
Assistant
District Attorney
Next
Appearance
Incident
-
Date:June
22, 2008
-
Summons/Ticket
#:
-
CJTN:63355383N
Arrest
Officer
Attorney
Information
Defense
Attorney
-
Name:Unk,
-
Type:Private
(Retained)
-
Court
Date:June 30, 2010
-
Court
Part:B
-
Phone:000
- 000 - 0000
Assistant
District Attorney
Next
Appearance
Docket
Sentence
No
Sentence Information on File
Docket
Sentence
No
Sentence Information on File
Incident
and Arrest
Incident
-
Date:June
22, 2008
-
Summons/Ticket
#:
-
CJTN:63355383N
Arrest
Officer
Attorney
Information
Defense
Attorney
-
Name:Unk,
-
Type:Private
(Retained)
-
Court
Date:June 30, 2010
-
Court
Part:B
-
Phone:000
- 000 - 0000
Assistant
District Attorney
Next
Appearance
Docket
Sentence
No
Sentence Information on File
Defendant
-
Name:Prantil,
Mary T
-
Birth
Year:1964
-
NYSID:3088617J
Back
to Index
Incident
and Arrest
Incident
-
Date:June
22, 2008
-
Summons/Ticket
#:
-
CJTN:63355383N
Arrest
Officer
Attorney
Information
Defense
Attorney
-
Name:Unk,
-
Type:Private
(Retained)
-
Court
Date:June 30, 2010
-
Court
Part:B
-
Phone:000
- 000 - 0000
Assistant
District Attorney
Next
Appearance
Docket
Sentence
No
Sentence Information on File
http://www.911ruff.org/
|
|